El reposicionamiento malar. Presentación de una técnica original: punto MM / Malar repositioning. Presentation of an original technique: point MM

El envejecimiento facial es una sinergia compleja de cambios texturales de la piel, hiper- o hipoactividad muscular, reabsorción del tejido graso y resorción ósea. El déficit de volumen resultante, la deflación y la posterior caída del tercio medio facial produce una cara menos atractiva y juvenil. Los procedimientos inyectables en región malar son cada vez más populares y solicitados por los pacientes. El conocimiento de la anatomía de la cara media es fundamental para el inyector. La comprensión de la irrigación facial puede ayudar a disminuir la exposición a la aparición de hematomas y complicaciones vasculares severas. Existen múltiples técnicas de inyección propuestas para el tercio medio, en este artículo presentamos una técnica original, simple, segura y eficaz con resultados satisfactorios y riesgo reducido

Facial aging is a complex synergy of textural skin changes, muscle hyperactivity, fat dysmorphism, bone resorption. The resulting volume deficit and deflation of the mid face produces a less attractive and youthful face. Injectable midface procedures are becoming increasingly popular and requested by patients. Knowledge of the anatomy of the midface is critical for the injector. Understanding the irrigation of the face can help decrease the risk of hematoma and severe vascular complications. There are multiple injection techniques proposed for the middle third, in this article we present a simple, safe and effective technique with satisfactory results and lower risk

The South American Glabellar Experience Study (SAGE): a multicenter retrospective analysis of real-world treatment patterns following the introduction of incobotulinumtoxinA in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: IncobotulinumtoxinA was approved in Argentina in 2007 for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluate real-world changes in facial aesthetic treatment patterns and patient satisfaction following the introduction of incobotulinumtoxinA in Argentina. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective chart review conducted in Argentina included women who had received at least 2 treatment cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA (Allergan, Irvine, California) for glabellar lines (period 1) prior to switching to incobotulinumtoxinA (Merz Pharma, GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany (period 2). Subjects were given the option to continue with incobotulinumtoxinA treatments (captured in period 2) or switch back to onabotulinumtoxinA (documented as period 3). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, dosing, reason for switching between products, treatment satisfaction, and interval between injection cycles. RESULTS: One hundred ten women were enrolled and collectively received 662 treatment cycles with botulinum toxin. Subjects were switched to incobotulinumtoxinA at unit doses that were numerically and statistically similar to the onabotulinumtoxinA doses they received in period 1. Most subjects (92%) initially switched to incobotulinumtoxinA because of lower cost. Ninety-two subjects (84%) switched back to onabotulinumtoxinA in period 3, most commonly due to insufficient duration of effect with incobotulinumtoxinA (61/92; 66%). Subjects reported satisfaction with treatment in >90% of their onabotulinumtoxinA visits and in 34% of their incobotulinumtoxinA visits. Median interinjection intervals with onabotulinumtoxinA were 180.3 days (period 1) and 176.9 days (period 3) and 144.3 days with incobotulinumtoxinA in period 2. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world setting, subjects did not appear to perceive the same facial aesthetic benefits from incobotulinumtoxinA as onabotulinumtoxinA when the products were administered at comparable doses.